Misdiagnosis or late diagnosis
Failure to identify oral cancer, periodontal disease or advancing decay until avoidable harm has been done.
Independent, plain-English guidance for patients who believe something has gone wrong with their dental treatment — and a calm first step toward understanding whether you may have a claim.

"I finally understood what had actually gone wrong with my treatment — before I spoke to a single solicitor."
Not every disappointing outcome is negligence. These are the situations we most often hear about from patients.
Failure to identify oral cancer, periodontal disease or advancing decay until avoidable harm has been done.
Persistent numbness, altered taste or chronic pain following extractions, root canal work or implants.
Poorly planned or badly placed implants, bridges and crowns causing infection or mechanical failure.
Veneers, whitening or aligner work carried out without proper planning, consent or clinical justification.
Legally, negligence is not the same as an outcome you are unhappy with. It is a breach of the duty of care owed by a clinician, where the treatment provided fell below the standard of a reasonably competent dentist.
For a claim to succeed, we must show causation — that the specific error directly caused harm that would not otherwise have occurred. This is the Bolam / Bolitho test applied to dental care.
Did the care fall below what a competent dentist would have provided in the same circumstances?
Was your injury a direct result of that failure, and not an inherent risk of the treatment itself?
Most patients are surprised by how methodical the process is. Nothing happens without your instruction, and at each stage you'll know exactly what's being done and why.
A quiet conversation to understand what happened. No paperwork, no commitment — just an honest view of whether your situation may be worth investigating.
Your full dental notes, x-rays and referral letters are requested under UK data-protection law and mapped against the treatment you actually received.
A dental specialist — with no connection to the practitioner concerned — reviews the care against the standard reasonably expected of a competent dentist.
Compensation is valued against injury, remedial treatment and long-term impact. Most claims settle without a court hearing; specialist counsel is instructed when needed.
Three simple questions. No commitment, no legal jargon — an honest first view of whether your situation may be worth investigating.

Three simple questions. No commitment, no legal jargon — an honest first view of whether your situation may be worth investigating.